The panelists at the Public Diplomacy Council event spoke about
their initiatives with new media. The diversity of countries represented was
impressive, although most of the speakers seemed to be tied to the U.S. State
Department. Their comments were interesting in regards to Arquilla
Ronfeldt’s essay on the noopolitik. Noopolitik, as Ronfeldt describes, “requires
governments to learn to work conjointly with civil-society NGOs that are
engaged in building transnational networks and coaltions.” The panelists on Thursday
did not mention any work with local NGOs in their countries of assignment.
Instead, they praised partnerships with the private sector. For example, Dr.
Michael Anderson spoke about @america’s use of Google Liquid Galaxy technology
in Jakarta, Indonesia.
A lot of what diplomats and foreign service officers do
comes down to funding, which many of the panelists acknowledged. Therefore, it
makes sense for them to seek partnerships with wealthy corporations like
Google. But global, although it does business on a global scale, is really an
American corporation. Its values are 100 percent American. They have often run
into trouble when expanding their efforts overseas. An idea that gets rave
reviews in the U.S. might not always go over well on the other side of the
world. When a friend of mine first showed me Google Earth, my reaction was “That’s
awesome.” But as Sangeet Kumar recounts in “Google Earth and the nation state,”
many countries had serious problems with the invasive technology. I wonder how
these nation states will react to Google Liquid Galaxy,
which is the basically the same thing, only cooler (or more dangerous,
depending on your point of view).
Much of what the panelists said reflected the utopianism
associated with social media. There are many benefits to engaging in dialogue
on Facebook or on Twitter including real-time communication and interactivity. But
technology does not solve all the world’s problems. In my opinion, technology reflects
some of the worst stereotypes about Americans. We are wealthy, greedy, and
terribly materialistic. In addition, not everyone has embraced social media or
even the Internet as much as Americans have. Successful public diplomacy
depends on the kind of work that Walter Douglas spoke about in Pakistan. Understanding
is key. His team analyzed Urdu conversations happening in the most popular
medium in Pakistan – television.
It seems that diplomacy gets underway with a government-mandated
agenda. If the government wants the embassy to tweet, that’s what the embassy
will do. But I think that more attention should be given to the kind of work
that Douglas does. What works for Americans is not always best. Diplomats
should adapt to the culture around them and also collaborate with other actors
like global NGOs.
No comments:
Post a Comment